Previous post: Perhaps a Yet Simpler Explanation…and more about Land
Rethinking the Process of Vision
A New Explanation for Light Interaction with the Retina of the Eye and the Vision Process
Previous post: Perhaps a Yet Simpler Explanation…and more about Land
This BBC video above "Colorful Notions" from 1985 first summarizes the classical theory of color vision and follows with the ideas of Edwin Land who personally explains and demonstrates his experiments. It can be viewed as an introduction to this work.
This is Sidebar 2. You can edit the content that appears here by visiting your Widgets panel and modifying the current widgets in Sidebar 2. Or, if you want to be a true ninja, you can add your own content to this sidebar by using the appropriate hooks.
Website design and development berchman.com
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
A Geometric Principle at the Heart of Non-Rigorously Geometric Biology
by Gerald Huth on June 16, 2006
Perhaps the most fundamental aspect of this explanation of the process of vision is that pure, rigorously geometrical or dimensional, factors effect the exact determination of wavelength in the certainly non-rigorously geometrical realm of biology. Geometrical nanostructure is at the heart of (I want to use the term ‘overlays’) a biological process.I refer here to my proposal that it is retinal receptor dimensionality and interreceptor dimensionality that is the specific wavelength determining factor of the retina. The maximum intensity of the ‘green’ (or 550 nm) wavelength, for example, is detected at 7-8 degrees of retinal angle in accordance with light refraction within the eye by the maximum density of cone/rod appositions that geometrically occurs at this point. And further, this wavelength-determining apposition geometrically forms the location where the exact midpoint of the visible band interacts on the retinal surface. In addition to validating Land who deduced that such a fixed point must be present, it provides the basis for an understanding of the historically mysterious color constancy of the vision process.
The principle is that an admixture of two dimensions (as the cones and rods are intermixed on the retina according to Osterberg) results in the specification of an exact, geometrically defined midpoint. Receptor size itself determines wavelength sensitivity and, importantly, the ratio of the difference in size of two dimensions determines where this midpoint occurs.
I have noted that the specific size ratio of cone and rod receptors comprising the retina is 1.8:1 (cone/rod) corresponds to the visible band (700-400 nm). And herein, in addition to defining a symmetrical midband point on the retina, enters the greater idea of geometrical (nanostructural) symmetry. Back in the recesses of this work (search the term ‘epitrochoid’) I noted that this size ratio is unique to defining a spatially symmetrical epitrochoidal shape (the same necessarily symmetrical epitrochoidal shape that Felix Wankel used in his internal combustion engine). Who knows?
But the idea of symmetry…and following the Olive Sacks comment (see previous) that ‘Landian’ correlations seem to take place in the vision centers of the brain…..might the concept of a spatial ‘nanostructural symmetry’ follow onward from the retina to perhaps new insights into the functional mechanisms of the brain? The unexpected occurrence of a ‘geometrical spatial symmetry’ in the biological realm…..??????
I am reminded here of a quote that I have used from Roger Penrose:
“There is, in fact, at least one clear place where action at the single quantum level can have importance in neural activity, and this is the retina (recall that the retina is a part of the brain).”
GCH