Comments on: A Request Made Again http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/05/a-request-made-again/ A New Explanation for Light Interaction with the Retina of the Eye and the Vision Process Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:54:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: ghuth http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/05/a-request-made-again/#comment-7932 ghuth Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:46:47 +0000 http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/05/a-request-made-again/#comment-7932 I really do not understand your comment. Are you speaking of new data although you use the past tense? If you know of new data taken at larger retinal angles I would like to see it! From the 1999 Roorda and Williams Letter ("The Arrangement of the Three Cone Classes in the Living Human Eye", Nature, Vol. 397, 11 February 1999, p.520) quote: "The mosaic was illuminated.....at a retinal eccentricity of one degree nasal from the foveal center". It was my point that what they observed was exactly what they should have seen at this retinal angle. Thanks for your continued interest! The web site had over 11,000 viewers in January! GCH I really do not understand your comment. Are you speaking of new data although you use the past tense? If you know of new data taken at larger retinal angles I would like to see it!

From the 1999 Roorda and Williams Letter (”The Arrangement of the Three Cone Classes in the Living Human Eye”, Nature, Vol. 397, 11 February 1999, p.520) quote: “The mosaic was illuminated…..at a retinal eccentricity of one degree nasal from the foveal center”.

It was my point that what they observed was exactly what they should have seen at this retinal angle.

Thanks for your continued interest! The web site had over 11,000 viewers in January!

GCH

]]> By: Joseph Carroll http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/05/a-request-made-again/#comment-7931 Joseph Carroll Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:19:41 +0000 http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/05/a-request-made-again/#comment-7931 I believe these measurements were made, at 10 degrees from the fovea, and there is no difference in L or M cone numerosity compared to the fovea. The results are to be presented at ARVO this year. But in typical fashion, you will forge ahead with blinders on, ignoring volumes of data that your theory can't explain. I believe these measurements were made, at 10 degrees from the fovea, and there is no difference in L or M cone numerosity compared to the fovea. The results are to be presented at ARVO this year.

But in typical fashion, you will forge ahead with blinders on, ignoring volumes of data that your theory can’t explain.

]]>