<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contrasting My Explanation for The Vision Process With Traditional Thought</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/25/contrasting-with-the-traditional-explanation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/25/contrasting-with-the-traditional-explanation/</link>
	<description>A New Explanation for Light Interaction with the Retina of the Eye and the Vision Process</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ghuth</title>
		<link>http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/25/contrasting-with-the-traditional-explanation/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>ghuth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 19:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/25/contrasting-with-the-traditional-explanation/#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>Not exactly - but you are close! No reference beam. Read on!!!

Best,

Gerry Huth</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not exactly - but you are close! No reference beam. Read on!!!</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Gerry Huth</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William Tahil</title>
		<link>http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/25/contrasting-with-the-traditional-explanation/#comment-7934</link>
		<dc:creator>William Tahil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 12:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ghuth.com/2008/01/25/contrasting-with-the-traditional-explanation/#comment-7934</guid>
		<description>So are you saying the retina is a diffraction grating which  creates an interference pattern from the incoming light waves and the brain then recreates the "image" of what we "saw" from this holographic interference pattern?  Then there has to be a reference beam - generated by the eye itself.  The rhodopsin molecules etc look like light emitting photopolymers to me as used in LEDs and electrochromic displays.  Popp also did much work on bio-photonic emission.

Antennae "transmit" to receive:  both processes happen simultaneously, one cannot happen without the other.  Thus one would expect our light receiving antennae to tranmit as well.

This means vision must be a phase conjugated process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So are you saying the retina is a diffraction grating which  creates an interference pattern from the incoming light waves and the brain then recreates the &#8220;image&#8221; of what we &#8220;saw&#8221; from this holographic interference pattern?  Then there has to be a reference beam - generated by the eye itself.  The rhodopsin molecules etc look like light emitting photopolymers to me as used in LEDs and electrochromic displays.  Popp also did much work on bio-photonic emission.</p>
<p>Antennae &#8220;transmit&#8221; to receive:  both processes happen simultaneously, one cannot happen without the other.  Thus one would expect our light receiving antennae to tranmit as well.</p>
<p>This means vision must be a phase conjugated process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
